HOW TO STUDY THE BIBLE?

A. A Regenerated Heart

1.  I Cor. 2:14 describes the natural man.

a.  This refers to the unsaved man who does not have the Spirit. (Jude 19)

b.  He receives not the things of the Spirit of God

c.   He cannot know them.

d.  They are foolish to him.

2.  John 8:43-44 – “Ye are of your father the devil” refers to ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­unsaved religious leaders.

a.  The unsaved could not understand His speech

b.  The unsaved could not hear His word

3.  Rom.8:5 – they that are after the  flesh – the unsaved   

a.  They mind the things of the flesh

b.  They have no mind for the things of the Spirit

4.  I Cor.1:18 – the preaching of the cross is foolishness to them that are perishing.

a.  If a man is spiritually dead, he cannot know, learn, or teach the Word of God properly.

B.  A Willing Heart

a.  John 7:17 – There must be a willingness to obey the truth once illuminated, or illumination will not be forthcoming.

1.  The Jewish leaders did not understand Jesus because they were stubborn.

2.  It was not because they lacked human intelligence.

3.  Their inability to understand had nothing to do with their head and everything to do with their heart.

4.  This makes studying the Bible unlike any other book

5.  They would not submit to Him, because they did not believe on Him.

6.  Why would God provide illumination for those He knows are unwilling to respond?

b.  Rev.2:7,11,17,29; 3:6,13,22 – He that hath an ear to hear let him hear.

1.  God acknowledges that some people have an “ear to hear” and others don’t.

2.  This is not a hearing problem, but a heart problem.

3.  Those who refuse to hear (refuse to learn; close their ears) not only WILL not learn, they will be judged.

4.  God expects us to be receptive to His still small voice… through the Word.

5.  Those who WILL not hear are willingly ignorant.

C.  A Meek and Submissive Heart 

a.  Psalm 25:9 – “The meek will He teach.”

1.  Meekness implies a humble, teachable spirit (not a proud know-it-all)

2.  God teaches the teachable; He knows the difference.

b.  Jas.1:21 – receive with meekness the engrafted word.

1.  We ought to be willing to hear what the Word has to say about our faults and weaknesses, and be GLAD that they are being pointed out… taking it patiently and thankfully.

c.   Matt. 11:28-30 – The meek man is one who has been brought under the yoke of Christ and is willing to submit himself to Christ as Lord.

1.  Vs.28 – Initially, we come to Christ in faith and receive salvation rest.

2.  Vs.29 – Then we come to Christ and submit to His yoke.

3.  It is only as we meekly submit to the One who Himself is meek and lowly, that we will ever truly LEARN of Him.

4.  Learning and meekness go hand in hand.

5.  A meek, tamed, docile spirit is not natural to us.

6.  It is our nature to be headstrong, defiant, brazen, and self willed. That spirit needs to be dealt with, and God’s method is the cross. He doesn’t tame our spirit. He puts it to death.

7.  Meekness is never ours until the heart, which is naturally elated and filled with pride, has been humbled and subdued… crucified with Christ… and left on the cross by faith.

8.  It is only the new creature that is humble and meek, and thus, able to learn.

D.  A Reverential Heart

a.  Psalm 25:12 – God teaches those who fear Him.

1.  The question he asks suggests that there aren’t many men who truly fear the Lord.

b.  Psalm 25:14 – The secret of the Lord is with those who fear Him

c.   Ps. 119:161 – my heart standeth in awe of thy word.

1.  We might liken this to your first gaze at the Grand Canyon. Standing on its rim, there is a bit of fear…(one false move and you’re dead!). You fear and respect the potential danger, but stand in awe of its beauty and glory.

d.  Isa. 66:2 – God looks to the one who trembles at His Word.

1.  Trembling is the right heart attitude towards God’s Word.

2.  What do you think it means to “tremble” before it? Why would we tremble?

e.  Prov. 1:7-The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge

1.  As we open God’s Word, our hearts should stand in awe… in utter reverence and respect.

2.  We should fear mistreating the Word misunderstanding the Word… or disobeying the Word.

3.  It is not to be approached as you would approach any other book.

4.  It is not like a crossword puzzle, or a mind game used to entertain or to occupy time. This is GOD’S Word.

5.  If we do not approach God’s Word with the right spirit, we will not learn from God.

E.  A Hungry Heart

a.  Hos. 6:3 -Then shall we know if we follow on to know…

1.  4:1,6 – Their problems stemmed from a “lack of knowledge” of who God is. They didn’t know God or His Word.

2.  Therefore, Hosea exhorts his countrymen to turn to the Lord.

3.  This expression might be understood in the following sense: “Let us know, let us pursue to know Yahweh.”

4.  It speaks of an all-out pursuit of God… a whole hearted pursuit; a hungering after Him; a hungering to know Him

5.  The knowledge the prophet calls for is not theoretical. It is more than just information.  

6.  He calls for an experiential and a practical knowledge which includes obedience and spiritual growth.

b.  Psalm 19:7-10 – “More to be desired are they than gold…”

1.  God’s Word is to be desired… longed for…

2.  It is longed for when we understand its value.

3.  When we understand its value, we will seek it as the treasure that it is.

c.   God makes Himself known to those He knows really want to know Him. And He makes Himself known through the Word.

d.  Jer.15:16 – God’s Word was found and I did eat it; it was the joy and rejoicing of his heart. The hungry heart EATS the Word… and loves it.

1.  Those who feed on the chaff of this world will not be hungry for the Word.

2.  If you don’t hunger and eat, you will not learn the Word of God. Hunger drives eating.

F.  A Clean Heart

a.  Jas. 1:21 –

b.  Put away sinful thoughts and actions.

1.  Put away = put off (as in changing clothes; used of putting off the old conversation)

2.  And when you look into the mirror of the Word and see dirt, get rid of it!

3.  If we are unwilling to remove the dirt God shows us in His Word, why would He want to show us any more?

4.  Receive: We are to RECEIVE the word.

5.  Sometimes that is painful when it points out dirt in our lives. But it is to be received anyway.

6. Note that putting away sin precedes receiving the Word.

7.  The engrafted word = planted like a seed.

8.  The purpose of receiving the Word is that it might bear FRUIT in us… not just that we might increase in intellectual knowledge of the book.

9.  Our ability to learn the Word is related to cleanliness.

10.  If we do not lay aside the filthiness, then we will not be able to see and learn.

11.  You might liken this to dirty eye glasses. You can see somewhat through dirty glasses, but if you want to see clearly, the glass needs to be clean.

12.  The unsaved can learn the Bible intellectually without even being saved. Surely there is sin in their hearts.

13.  But to TRULY learn the Word, requires a clean heart, for true learning is from the Lord. It is being taught by God Himself through His Word.

14.  When we receive the Word the right way (having put away filthiness), our SOULS are saved.

15.  This does not refer to justification. He is talking to “brethren” (saved).

16.  He is speaking about the power of the Word of God in the life of a believer to deliver us from the present power of sin. (victory)

17.  This is not simply an intellect pursuit or academic learning. This is learning the Word experientially, by practicing the Word.

c.    James 1:21 – We must lay apart all filthiness before we are able to receive the Word.

1.   The phrase, “the engrafted word” likens the Scriptures to a planted seed.

2.  Ability to learn the Word is related to cleanliness.

d.   I Pet.2:1-3 – We must lay aside all malice and evil before we will ever desire the sincere milk of the Word (same word as put away in James 1:21)

e.   I John 1:9 – All sins must be confessed. This is necessary on a daily basis to maintain a clean heart, for our hearts are polluted daily.

f.     Proverbs 28:13 – All sin must be confessed and forsaken.

G.  An Obedient Heart

a.  Jas. 1:22 – Be ye doers of the Word.

1.  The word of God is not learned until we are DOING what it says.

b.  Learning involves much more than simply being able to memorize a verse, repeat it to others verbatim. Learning requires putting it into practice… DOING.

c.   James 1:22 – Willing to be DOERS of the Word.

1.  God gives us understanding in His Word for a purpose: that we might OBEY.

2.  The Bible is not to be studied just so that we can figure out what it means in order to satisfy our curiosity.

3.  It is to be studied to be put into practice… to be lived.

d.  Ps. 119:33 – Teach me, O LORD, the way of thy statutes; and I shall keep it unto the end.

e.  Ps. 86:11 – Teach me thy way, O LORDI will walk in thy truth: unite my heart to fear thy name.

f.     Psalm 119:33-34 – The psalmist expected God to give him understanding because he was determined to keep God’s law and observe it with his whole heart. All others need not apply!

  • Ps. 66:18 – If we regard iniquity in our hearts, the Lord will not hear us. He will not hear our prayer to TEACH us in His Word.
  • Why should God show us His will and ways in His Word unless we are willing to DO what He says?
  • Remember, true Bible learning comes from God, not a book or human intellect.

H.  An Undivided Heart

a.   Matt.6:22 – The “single eye”

  • The light of the body is the eye
  • The light (lamp or lens) = the eye gate.
  • Just as light enters a camera through the lens, so light enters into a human body through the eye. The eye is our only channel of vision.
  • A single eye is full of light
  • Light speaks of truth and understanding
  • A single eye speaks of single minded allegiance to Christ.
  • A heart that is single minded in its allegiance to Christ will be full of light and understanding

b.   Matt. 6:23 – The “evil eye.”

  •  In context, the evil eye is the opposite of a single  eye. (double vision – not focused on a single object)

1.  If the eye is evil (bad), then the body is full of darkness. The only channel of light is malfunctioning.  (Used of bad fruit – not a good, fresh quality; Matt. 7:17)

2.  In the same way, our heart is the only channel of divine truth. If our heart is evil (bad; not functioning properly) then we too will walk in darkness.

3.  In context, the malfunction to which Jesus refers is a divided heart… divided allegiance.

  • An evil eye is full of darkness.
  • Darkness speaks of ignorance.
  •  If the eye is evil, then the body is full darkness. The eye (the body’s only gateway for light) is malfunctioning.  
  • In the same way, our heart is the only gateway for divine truth. If our heart is evil (bad; not functioning properly) then we too will walk in darkness.
  • A malfunctioning heart will blind us to truth.
  • In context, the malfunction to which Jesus refers is a divided  allegiance.
  • Divided treasures (vs.19);  divided masters (vs.24); a divided eye or heart (vs.22)

1.  Our heart (eye) is divided when its allegiance is divided between Christ and the world or mammon.

2.  If our heart is allegiant to the world, we will not grasp spiritual truth… heavenly things. They will seem foolish to us because we are behaving like a natural man.

3.  When our eye (focus of our heart) is obsessed with earthly, material things, we will not understand spiritual things. Our ability to understand spiritual truth depends upon the spiritual condition of our heart.

4.  If we want LIGHT from God to shine upon us (illumination) our hearts need to be in good shape spiritually.

5.  If that is not the case, then we will experience darkness… an inability to truly grasp spiritual truths.

d.  Ps. 86:11 – Teach me thy way, O LORD; I will walk in thy truth: unite my heart to fear thy name.

1.  Here the psalmist prays that God would teach him AND unite his heart.

2.  “Unite my heart” speaks of single minded allegiance.

3.  He desired a greater degree of single minded allegiance.

4.  That is the person who is qualified to ask God to teach him His ways.

5.  If that is the desire of our heart – to have a heart that has ONE Master, the Lord will teach us… and grant us even more dedication to Him.

I.   A Trusting Heart

a.  Psalm119:66 – The one who trusts God can expect to be taught of God.

1.  He prays for discernment here.

2.  FOR: the fact that he believes (trusts) God is the basis upon which he asks and expects a positive response.

3.  The one who trusts in the Lord will receive discernment. Discernment is needed in studying the Bible.

4.  Without discernment (common sense; wisdom) serious Bible blunders will be made.

b.   The one who trusts God can expect to be taught of God.

ü  The psalmist asks God, “Teach me good judgment and knowledge FOR I have believed thy commandments.

c.   Prov.3:5 – Trust in the Lord with ALL your heart

1.  If we lean on our own understanding, we are forsaking the teaching ministry of the Holy Spirit.

2.  Our own understanding is the “mind of the flesh.” The flesh is spiritually blind and ignorant.

3.  In this context, trusting in the Lord is the opposite of leaning on one’s own understanding.

4.  Spiritual truth is learned through faith, not intellect alone.

d.  Heb.11:3 – Through faith we understand…  Some truths are learned only through faith.

J.   A Loving Heart (for Christ)

a.  Teaching involves being able to say, “I KNOW whom I have believed…”  (II Tim.1:12) [Note: not what I believe]

b.  The goal of studying and learning the word ought to be to know Him, for it is the Word of Christ. (Phil.3:10)

c.   Love is willing to sacrifice. (Phil.3:8)

d.  A love for Christ will motivate us to want to spend time in His Word that we might know HIM in a deeper way.

e.  Deut. 13:3 – God used false prophets to TEST His people to see if they truly loved Him or not. Our love for the Lord is connected to our love of the truth. When we start dabbling in other “sources” of truth, we demonstrate a lack of love for the Lord. It is like flirting with another lover.

f.    Eph.3:17-19 – a deep rooted love for Christ is required that we might “comprehend” the depth of His love. In this case, spiritual comprehension is conditioned upon our love for Christ.

g.  The reason we study and learn the Bible is that we might know Christ… and express our love to Him. He knows if we are studying the Word with the right motive. We study to increase our RELATIONSHIP to Him… not just to increase data in our heads.

K.  A Loving Heart (for the Word)

a.  Ps.119:97 – “O how love I thy law!”

b.  Ps. 1:2 – his delight is in the Word. That’s why he meditates on it day and night.

c.   God knows if we love His Word or not. He teaches those who really LONG to know Him and His Word.

d.   Learning comes through loving.

e.   Learning the Word is an exercise of the heart as much as an exercise of the head

  1. God Desires for Us to know His Word
  • I would not that ye should be ignorant brethren (Paul uses this expression seven times; e.g. Rom. 1:13)
  • There is no premium on being ignorant of the Bible
  • Ignorance is not bliss, it is dangerous 

iii.     Wolves prey on the ignorance of sheep.

  1. II Cor. 2:11– Our ignorance gives Satan an advantage over us.
  • The Bible was given toreveal not conceal truth, not to conceal it. The whole point of revelation is that we might KNOW the things that are given to us through this means. (I Cor. 2:13)
  • I Corinthians 14:20 – “Brethren, be not children inunderstanding: howbeit in malice be ye children, but in  understanding be men.
  1. The Bible can beknown.
  • Deut. 29:29 – “The secret things belong unto the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law.”
  • I John 5:13 – These things were written by John so that his readers might know.
  1. The Bible is easily misunderstood
  • Examples: “My father is greater than I.”  (John 14:28)
  • “For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, 6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance.” (Heb.6:4-5)

 iii. “He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved.”  (Mark 16:16)

  •  “And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; they shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.” (Mark 16:17-18)
  • There are countless interpretations of the Bible… from the orthodox, to the questionable, to the downright bizarre.
  • Eph. 4:14 –Children are easily deceived and are led into a false understanding of the Word. Therefore, be no more children, tossed to and fro and deceived. Grow up… learn the Word!
  • Since the Bible is easily misunderstood, and since God WANTS us to know what He said, theremust be a way to understand the revelation God has given.
  • The Bible is easily misunderstood, but careful, diligent study using the literal method of interpretation is God’s means to accomplish that end.
  1. Our Adversary theDevil
  • Matt. 4:5-6 – Satan seeks totwist the Word.
  • Rev.12:9 – the devil seeks todeceive the whole world.
  • II Cor. 11:3-4 – Satan seeks tocorrupt minds from the simplicity that is in Christ. The simplest way to understand the Bible is to take it for what it actually says.  
  • II Cor.11:13-15 – Satan has his own “ministers” who seek to corrupt minds too… who appear as angels of light.
  1. The Influence of theWorld
  • Our culture exerts pressure on the interpreter to interpret the Bible in light of the world’s cultural norms, rather than interpreting the Bible on the basis of what it actually says.
  • Examples:
  •  The Spirit of the age says that the gay lifestyle is acceptable. Hence, the Bible is interpreted in light of that world view.
  •  The spirit of the age says that men and women share equal roles in the home. Wives are not to submit to their husbands. Thus, the roles of the men and women in the Bible are interpreted in light of that view.

                                     iii.   The spirit of the age is addicted to science – even some which is what Paul calls “science falsely so called.” The world exerts pressure on the believer to interpret the Bible in light of what modern science says (Example: creation; miracles; etc.)

  •  The spirit of the age says that children should not be spanked. That is a cultural taboo today. Hence, Bible passages are interpreted through that lens… and the interpretation is distorted.
  •  The spirit of the age is driven by materialism. Hence, we see the Bible being interpreted in that light: the gospel of health and wealth. (He became poor that we might become rich; forgive us our debts; etc.)
  • The spirit of the age (worldly thinking) determines what they think the Bible should mean. Bible interpretation is forced through their lens… through their slanted prism. This distorts what the Bible actually says.
  • “Culture” is used very often as anexcuse NOT to take God’s Word for what it says. (Paul wrote what he did about women because that’s what his culture taught him… etc.)
  • Believers are influenced by the “thinking of men”, what Paul calls the wisdom of men.
  • This is a spiritual obstacle to be overcome. It is a hindrance to Bible interpretation.
  • Rom.12:1-2 – be not conformed to this world… but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Minds are renewed by the Word of God.
  •  World = age = the spirit of the age
  •  Before our minds can be renewed, we must first be yielded to God – as a living sacrifice. (vs.1)

 iii.    Transformed = a total change from the inside out. (Present; pass; imp.) = keep on being transformed. God does the transforming.

  • He does it by renewing the way we THINK.
  •  Thus, Paul states that our mind (our thinking) is shaped either by the world (external conformity) OR by God and His Word (internal transformation).
  •  What we have been filling our minds with will greatly affect our ability to know and understand the Bible.

 

  1. Peer Pressure from a Christian denomination, church, or group
  • Denominations and “fellowships” put pressure upon those pastors in their denomination to “stick to the party line.”
  • Many of these groups put out “resolutions” at their conventions each year on various topics… from doctrines, to politics, to standards, etc. And all in the group are expected to defend those resolutions.
  • The problem is that those resolutions were not in place when the man joined in the first place… and he may not entirely agree… but it pressured to hold the party line or to be rejected from the group. That is not healthy.
  • To a lesser degree, individual churches can also exert pressure to conform to their views as well. (Bible version; hats; pet doctrines; homeschooling; etc.)
  • Interpretation of the Bible ought to be based upon what the text says, NOT on what an individual or a group SAYS that it says.
  • I John 4:1 – We are not to believe every spirit (Bible teacher).
  • Acts 17:11 – Each believer is accountable for what he believes. We are to search the Scriptures to see if it is so.

 

  1. The Natural Inclination of the Flesh
  • Pride: Can affect interpretation.
  •  The flesh is proud. Personal pride can have an effect on interpretation
  •  The flesh has a hard time believing what the Bible says about the flesh: no good thing; incurably sick;
    etc. Human pride slants our understanding of such passages.

 iii.   (I’ve always believed “X”. I’ll never change my views. After all, Pastor SO and So taught it! That’s what my denomination believes! It would be too embarrassing for me to admit now that I was wrong all these years!”)

  •  Only Neanderthals believe in a six day creation!  What would my colleagues think of me? Days must really mean millions of years!
  • Unbeliefcan affect our interpretation. 
  • Sometimes what the Bible says is hard to believe.
  • Rapture, resurrection, miracles,

                                 
iii.     Liberalism has been hammering away against taking the Word for what it says. We are influenced by that unbelief… and sometimes take that baggage with us as we study.

  •  If you start off with the premise that supernatural events are impossible… then you will miss the point of the Christian faith entirely.
  • Selfishness can affect our interpretation
  • The crucified life does not come easy to the flesh because we love self.
  • Thus, there is always the desire in us to take the easy route.

                                 
iii.   The flesh would love to believe that the Bible doesn’t REALLY mean what it says when we are commanded to give as Jesus gave to us; to love our enemies; to be a living sacrifice; forgive someone 490 times in a row!

  • There is a tendency to filter what the Bible says through the filter of what is comfortable for self. The flesh BLINDS us to the truth. It separates us from God, and we NEED Him to illuminate Scripture for us. The inability of an unsaved man to understand spiritual things is related to the blindness (hardness) of his heart… not the lack of intellect. (Eph.4:18)
  • We “need to know” how to study the Bible because we have everything working against us from understanding it: the world, the flesh, and the devil.
  1.  The danger of Biblical ignorance
  • Matthew 22:29 – Ye do err not knowing the Scriptures
  • Hosea 4:1 – God had an argument with the Jews because they were lacking the knowledge of God in the land.
  • Hosea 4:6 – God’s people were destroyed because of a lack of knowledge of God and His Word. All these issues combine to form a powerful mandate for the believer to know the Word and to know HOW to study the Word.

A.   God’s Role

1.   Illumination

a.   This is the work of the Holy Spirit in which He enlightens those who are saved and in a right relationship to Him that they might know and understand the Scriptures.

b.   Do not confuse illumination with revelation or inspiration.

c.    “In reference to the Bible, revelation relates to its content or material, inspiration to the method of recording that material, and illumination to the meaning of the record.” (Charles Ryrie)

d.   Illumination is God’s work of opening the spiritual eyes of our understanding that we might know the deep things of God found within His Word. (Eph.1:18) This was Paul’s prayer for the Ephesians.

e.   Hence the prayer in Psalm 119:16 – “Open my eyes that I might behold wondrous things from thy Law.”

f.     Psalm 119:125 – “Give me understanding that I may know thy testimonies.”

g.   Col. 1:9 – this prayer is that they might be filled with the knowledge of His will in all spiritual understanding. God fills us with that knowledge as we study His word.

h.   Through this Spiritual knowledge, we come to know more than doctrine. We come to know Christ… and commune with Him.

i.      I Pet.2:5 – Every Christian is a believer-priest. God teaches and illuminates each one of us individually. Illumination is the birth right of every believer.

j.     Luke 24:32 – God opens to us the Scriptures. This is the source of such great JOY in the Christian life. 

     2.   Teaching

a.   I Cor.2:12 – we have been given the Spirit that we might KNOW the things that are freely given to us of God.

b.   I Cor.2:14 – without the Spirit we CANNOT know the things of the Spirit. We can learn the facts, but we cannot KNOW spiritual truth and see its true significance. It is FOOLISH to the natural man.

c.    John 14:26 – the Holy Spirit is a Teacher.

 i.     This of course is a promise only to the apostles, but it does state that the Spirit is a Teacher.

ii.     John 16:13 – He promised to guide into all truth

d.   I John 2:20 – an unction from the Spirit and ye know all things

e.   I John 2:27 – the Spirit teaches you all things  

     3.   Opening the Understanding

a.   Luke 24:45 – Then He opened their understanding that they might understand the Scriptures.

b.   Acts 16:14 – God opened Lydia’s’ heart

c.    However, God does not open our understanding in a miraculous manner. We are not brought into a trance. He does not supernaturally “download” Bible knowledge into our heads. This is where human responsibility comes into play.

 B.   Man’s Role

     1.   Prayer

a.   Psalm 119:18 – The psalmist asked God to open his eyes. This was a prayer for illumination.

b.   Someone once said, “The man who speaks to men for God must begin by speaking to God for man.”

c.    Alfred Gibbs wrote, “Theology must be accomplished by kneeology.”

d.   Eph. 1:17-18 – Pray that God would give you the spirit of wisdom and understanding in the knowledge of Him and that He would open the eyes of your understanding.

e.   James 1:5 – Those who need wisdom from God’s Word in facing trials are told to pray and God will respond.

f.     Ps.25:4 – Shew me thy ways, O LORD; teach me thy paths. Lead me in thy truth, and teach me: for thou art the God of my salvation; on thee do I wait all the day.  (This is a prayer)

     2.   Diligent study –

a.   But prayer is no substitute for study!

b.   Illumination is no substitute for study.

c.    There IS no substitute for studying.

a.   II Tim. 2:15 – Study to show thyself approved.

b.   There is no shortcut in studying the Word. It takes much TIME, but it is time well invested.

c.    Prov.2:1-6 – Seek for wisdom (in the Word) as men seek after gold.

d.   “Much study is a weariness of the flesh.” (Ecc. 2:12b)

e.   I Tim. 5:17 speaks of elders who “labour in the word and doctrine.”   (It is labor: labor, fatigue, worn out, weary, faint)

f.     It is hard work to study and prepare a Bible lesson, and it requires sacrifice on the part of the teacher. (Cf. I Sam. 24:24 – we cannot offer something to God that did not cost us.)

g.   Heb. 5:11-14 – Diligence is required lest we decline in understanding.

h.   “The enemy will encourage you to do anything but carry out the systematic, Spirit-taught study of the Bible. He will give religious experiences, feelings and pious thoughts—all apart from God’s Word. Do not be deceived. The Scriptures are our only sustenance—there are no substitutes.” –J.B.

      3.   Perseverance: Continual studying, seeking and digging

a.   II Tim.3:14-17– Continue the things thou has learned.

b.   I Tim.4:16 – continue in doctrine.

c.    Acts 6:4 – The apostles gave themselves continually to prayer and to the ministry of the Word. 

d.   Prov. 2:1-5 – Diligent effort and labor is rewarded with wisdom from God.

e.   Matt. 7:7 – Keep on knocking and keep on seeking and you will keep on finding.

f.     John 8:31 – True disciples continue in the Word. They keep on learning and digging.

g.   A disciple is a student of the Word.

      4.   Reading

a.   Rev.1:3 – Blessed is he that readeth.

b.   Eph. 3:3-4– “When ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ.”

c.    Rom.15:4 – “These things were written for our learning.”

d.   I John 5:13 – “These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life…”

e.   I Tim. 4:13 – give attendance to reading

f.     It might seem quite obvious, but if we are not reading the Word on our own, we will not understand the Word.

g.   The better you know the Bible as a whole, (which comes from reading) the better equipped you are to interpret any portion thereof. It gives you wisdom and discernment. You avoid making “rookie” mistakes in interpretation.

h.   If you are going to study a book of the Bible, read it over and over again. If it is an epistle – read it every day while you study it. If it is a larger book, read a portion of it each day. Let it sink in.

i.      Don’t rely on hearing messages at church only.

j.     Read the Word on your own. As you do, the messages at church will be more meaningful and helpful.

k.    If you don’t read, much of what you hear will go over your head.

l.      Improve your reading skills. If you don’t know what a word means, use a dictionary. Take a Basic English course if necessary to brush up on your reading skills.

m.  Neh. 8:5-6 – When you read the Bible, do so with reverence. It is not like any other book. Reading the Bible should evoke worship. 

5.   Meditation

a.   Josh.1:8 – Meditate in God’s Word night and day.

b.   Psalm 119:97-99

i.     Verse 97 – The psalmist meditated in the Word because he loved the Word.

ii.     Verses 98-99 – The psalmist meditated on the Word because through the Word he was made wiser.

 

c.    II Tim. 2:7 – Understanding comes by considering. As we consider, God gives us understanding.

 i.     Consider: to think upon, heed, ponder, reflect upon; present active imperative

 ii.     Give: to give to another; to bestow;   aorist optative  (a prayer)

 iii.     AS we meditate on His Word, God gives understanding. It is God’s reward for those who seek and hunger.

d.   But do not use meditation as a substitute for study. Meditation is most valuable AFTER you study!

e.   Meditation on the WRONG interpretation of a verse is not all that helpful.

6.   Bible Teachers

a.   Ephesians 4:11 – God appointed pastors and teachers in the Body to teach His Word.

b.   Teachers are a part of God’s plan for learning His Word.

c.    The Spirit’s work as a Teacher and Illuminator does not mean that human teachers are not necessary.

d.   Some have proudly declared, “I have the Holy Spirit as my teacher. I don’t need church. I don’t need the ministry of a human teacher. I have the Holy Spirit!”

e.   Nothing could be further from the truth. The Holy Spirit inspired Eph. 4:11 which tells us of the importance of human teachers.

f.     Pastors and Bible teachers are gifts from God to you for your learning and spiritual growth.

g.   I Cor.12:28 – God hath set  teachers in the church.

h.   Nehemiah 8:8 – Bible teachers are to give the sense of a passage and cause men to understand the reading.

i.      Be faithful in attending Sunday School, church services, Bible studies, etc.  (Heb.10:24-25)

j.     Neh. 8:8 – A Bible teacher should enable you to understand what the Bible means. That is God’s purpose for teachers.

k.    Through written literature, we have access to Bible teachers from ages past too! There is a vast reservoir of good Bible teaching to be found in Christian literature. But there is a danger is that too. Be careful what you read. Find out if it is worth reading. 

7.   Maintain a right heart attitude.

a.   I Cor. 3:1-2 – Carnality hindered the Corinthians from understanding the meat of the Word.

b.   Isaiah 59:2 – Sin separates us from God, without whom we cannot learn. Sin keeps us in the dark and hinders us from being enlightened.

c.    Chafer noted that God made understanding His Word “dependent upon a state of heart which is not only yielded to God, but is ever ready to be conformed to the Word He has spoken.”

d.   Spiritual understanding is as much an activity of the heart as it is of the head.

e.   Both head and heart need to be engaged in the process of learning. 

8.   Use good tools

a.   Bible dictionaries (Vines; Zodhiates; Word Study of the NT & OT)

b.   Bible encyclopedias (Ungers; ISBE)

c.    Concordance

d.   Englishman’s Concordance

e.   Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

f.     Naves Topical Bible

g.   Greek and Hebrew word study books

h.   Commentaries

i.      Bible software

j.     Internet websites: (The following web sites have much good information, but we cannot endorse everything on these sites. Read with discernment.)

 i.     salembible.org

 ii.     middletownbiblechurch.org

 iii.     stempublishing.com

 iv.     preceptaustin.org

 v.     bible.org

vi.     Biblical Discernment Ministries

vii.     Cobblestone Road Ministries 

9.   Don’t be afraid of using technology in the study of God’s Word.

a.   A teacher or pastor can use Bible software either to (1) study God’s Word more effectively and efficiently or (2) as a means of avoiding Bible study by copying someone else’s studies. 

b.   The fault lies with the character of the person, not the “tool”.  It all depends upon what you DO with the tool.

c.    We have wonderful tools today for studying. There is no excuse NOT to study and learn 

Literal, Grammatical, Historical

 

Everyone uses “a” method of Bible study and interpretation, whether conscious or not. Some use what has been called the magic finger method. Others use the devotional approach, and make application before they are sure of what the verse actually means. Yet others are content to let others tell them what the Bible means… missing out on the joy of discovering truths in the Word for themselves. Unfortunately some others have given up on Bible study altogether, having concluded that it is just too complicated. There are better ways to approach the subject of Bible study.

 

The best method of interpreting the Bible is to understand this Book as you would any other piece of literature or human speech.

 

Dr. Henry Morris : “”The best interpretation of a historical record is no interpretation but simply letting the divine Author of the record say what He says and assuming He says what He means.” (The Revelation Record)

 

Walter Kaiser on the basis of human communication: “The general rules for interpreting oral or written speech are not learned, invented, or discovered by men; rather they are part and parcel of our nature as individuals made in the image of God. This art has been in use ever since God gave the gift of communication and speech itself. The person spoken to is always the interpreter and the person speaking is always the author.”

 

 

Presuppositions of the literal method of Bible interpretation:

  1. That the Word of God is true and does not  contradict itself
  2. Since God is the Author behind the human authors, the Scriptures are true.
  3. Even if what the Bible says contradicts what we have previously assumed to be true. It does contradict science false so called; psychology; anthropology; even geology. Don’t ever say, “The Bible couldn’t mean what it says, for everybody knows the earth is billions of years old… or everybody knows that men are born with a blank slate…”
  4. Let God be true and every man a liar.\That God expects men to understand His Word
  5. God have given us all the equipment we need to understand His Word: minds; hearts; the Holy Spirit; illumination; etc.
  6. That God’s Word is to be understood according to the regular laws governing human communication
  7. That the Bible says what it means and means what it says
  8. Don’t make Bible interpretation more difficult than it is.
  9. Just take God’s Word at face value.
  10. That our goal is to understand what the author meant when he wrote it, not what we think it means to us or how it makes us feel.

 Literal  Definitions

  1. The word literal is defined by Webster as: “The natural or usual construction and implication of a writing or expression; following the ordinary and apparent sense of words; not allegorical or metaphorical.”  (Webster’s New Dictionary)
  2.      This is the way we communicate in ever day speech.
  3.      We ALL employ this method of interpretation in speech, in reading literature, in legal contracts, and in other forms of communication.

                              iii.     Imagine if you bought a new car and the seller used the “spiritual” method of interpreting the contract? ($600.00 per month for five years doesn’t literally mean for five literal years. It means an undetermined length of time… and $600.00 means a large sum of money… which is to be determined by the interpreter.)

  1. “To interpret means to explain the original sense of a speaker or writer. To interpret literally means to explain the original sense of the speaker or writer according to the normal, customary, and proper usages of words and language. Literal interpretation of the Bible simply means explaining the original sense of the Bible according to the normal and customary usages of its language.” [1]
  2. “The literal method of interpretation is that method that gives to each word the same exact basic meaning it would have in normal, ordinary, customary usage, whether employed in writing, speaking or thinking.”[2]
  3. As stated in our definition, the literal method assigns to every word and phrase the same meaning it would have in its normal usage, whether employed in speaking, writing, or thinking.
  4. To understand the literal meaning of a word in the Bible, use a dictionary.
  5. Keep in mind that the Old Testament was written in Hebrew and Aramaic, and the New Testament in Greek.
  6. Use a good Bible dictionary to discover the meaning of the word in the original language.
  7. The very words of Scripture were the exact words chosen by God to convey a specific meaning to the readers (I Cor.2:13). The words were God-breathed. (II Tim.3:16)
  8. Over time, words often change meaning.
  9.      Examples in the KJV:
  • I Thess. 4:15 – prevent = precede
  • I Cor. 13:1 – charity = love
  • Gal. 1:13 – conversation = conduct
  • Matt. 3:4 – meat = food
  1.      Examples of ancient Greek terms:
  • Eph. 1:13 – earnest – ἀρραβών – Earnest money, a pledge, something which stands for part of the price and paid beforehand to confirm the transaction.) 
  • In modern Greek this term is the word for wedding band.
  • What matters is what meaning the author attached to it; what it meant in his day, not what it means today.
  1. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the literal meaning of the term in its original language, and its literal meaning in the day in which it was written.
  2. The Evidence for a literal method [3]
  3. The literal meaning is the normal approach in all languages.
  4. All secondary meanings of documents, parables, types, allegories, and symbols, depend for their very existence on the previous literal meaning of the terms.
  5. The greater part of the Bible makes adequate sense when interpreted literally.
  6. The literal approach does not blindly rule out figures of speech, symbols, allegories, and types.
  7. This method provides the only sane and safe check on the imagination of men.
  8. This method is the only one consonant with the nature of inspiration. (The very words of Scripture were inspired.)
  9. Old Testament prophecies which have been fulfilled have been fulfilled literally.
  10.  Psalm 22; Isaiah 7:14; Micah 5:2
  11. It should be noted that there are a handful of prophecies in the New Testament that “appear” to have a non-literal fulfillment, though that is debated. It may be that the authors had a different meaning for “fulfill.”

 

  1. The advantages of the literal method [4]
  2. It grounds interpretation in fact. (objective data; word meanings; etc.)
  3. It exercises a control over interpretation
  4. It has had the greatest success in opening up the Word of God
  5. It delivers us from human reasoning and mysticism
  1.  Grammatical
  2. We employ the literal, grammatical, historical method.
  3. This means that grammar must be analyzed in the interpretation.
  4. Grammar plays an important role in interpreting the text of Scripture.

 

  1. The study of grammar includes:
  2. lexicology (meaning of words)
  3.      It is necessary to look up the word in a good lexicon in the original language, not just in our English Bible.
  4.      Rom. 5:11 – atonement = reconciliation (atonement = at-one-ment)

iii.     I John 2:2 – world = kosmos (orderly system; not elect!)

  1.      John 14:1 – “In my Father’s house are many mansions.” (Mansions means dwelling places – not a large estate with white pillars out front!)
  2. morphology (form of words)
  3.      I John 2:2 – “He is the propitiation for our sins.”  Is = estin, the present tense form of eimi, to be. He continually is the propitiation for our sins.
  4.      Gal.3:16 – Paul’s whole argument is based upon whether the form of the word seed is singular or plural.

                                           iii.     In the Greek NT, an adjective agrees with the noun it modifies in number, case, and person.

  1.      Eph.2:8-9 – What does “touto” (that) refer to? Does it refer to faith as the gift of God? However, faith is feminine and touto is neuter. Hence, it must refer to either a neuter noun OR to the subject in general – namely salvation.
  2.      There are good Bible commentaries and grammars that can help you with that – even if you are not a Greek scholar.
  3.      It is necessary to follow the rules of grammar in interpreting a passage.
  4. parts of speech (function of words)
  5.      Rom. 4:25 – consider the meaning of the preposition “for”  (It can mean “because of” [He died for our sins] or “in order to” [I went to the store for a loaf of bread])
  6.  syntax (relationship of words)
  7.      This is a complicated study of the relationships between words, phrases, sentences… the structure of language etc.
  8.      Language has rules. The Bible was written in a language that has rules.

iii.     Sentences have structure – subject, verb, direct object,  indirect object; adverbial phrases, adjectival phrases, etc.

  1.      A healthy dose of common sense is a must in considering the relationship of words and phrases to each other.
  2.      To properly interpret the Bible, the rules of grammar and syntax must be followed.

 

  1. Rules of grammar must be followed by the interpreter.
  2. Number: singular or plural?
  3. Conjugation of verbs: is determinate in interpreting many passages. (Past, present, future?)
  4. Knowing rules of grammar is extremely helpful in ruling in or out certain interpretations. (Ex: Titus 2:13 – God and our Savior – Granville Sharp Rule)
  5. A grammatical diagram is often helpful in interpreting a passage.
  6. Pay attention to prepositions.
  7.      They identify relationships of the nouns to other words in the sentence. (Was he in, on, outside, or under?)
  8. Pay attention to important connectors:
  9.      That… so that… in order that (purpose; reason)
  10. Gal. 5:17 – “so that ye cannot do the things that ye will” is connected to the fact that the Spirit and the flesh are contrary one to the other. (result)
  11.      And/or

iii.     But – Romans 12:2 – don’t be conformed BUT be ye transformed.

  1.      Therefore/wherefore –
  2. Rom.2:1 – In light of what he said in chapter one about the depravity of the pagans…
  3. II Cor. 5:17 – because we do not know Christ after the flesh but as a Risen Savior… Therefore, all things are new to us as new creatures.
  4. Pay attention to words that indicate time:
  5.      Verb tenses
  6.      Before, after, when, during, while, then, etc.
  7. Consider the sentence structure:
  8.      What is the subject of the verb?
  9.      Does the verb express action or state of being?

iii.     Does the verb express action that is past, present, or future? Is it an imperative?

  1.      What action does the subject do?
  2.      What or who is the object of the verb?
  3.      What are the modifiers? (of the nouns, verbs, clauses, etc.)
  4. Whether you have memorized the rules of grammar or not, you USE them every time you open your mouth.

 

  1. Historical
  2. We employ the literal, grammatical, historical method.
  3. Christianity is based on history
  4.      It stems from the history of the Old Testament
  5.      It is based upon the historicity of Jesus Christ…

 iii.     It requires us to believe in the death, burial, and resurrection as historical facts

  1.      Much of the Bible is a book of history
  2.      The Bible can only be understood in the context of history

 

  1. By historical interpretation we mean that a passage is to be interpreted in light of its historical setting and context.
  2.      Consider the historical setting of the author
  3. For example, the Old Testament prophets are unintelligible apart from the knowing something of the history.
  4.      Consider the historical setting of the readers
  5. The book of Hebrews
  6. The (very Jewish) gospel of Matthew
  7. One problem we face in interpreting the Bible is that it was written thousands of years ago in a culture that is foreign to ours.
  8.      If we lived in Bible times, the language, culture, and customs would come naturally to us.
  9.      But since we do not, we have to incorporate the study of language, culture, customs, and history into our study of the Bible.

 iii.     We want to discover what the author/speaker meant by the words and expressions he used in the Bible in the day they were written/spoken.

  1. For many years scholars thought that the Greek of the New Testament was a special form of Greek used only in the Bible. (A holy language)  It was later discovered that it was actually the Greek of the common man, and thus was called Koine Greek (common Greek).
  2. We want to discover the ordinary meaning of what is written… what the author meant and what he expected his readers to understand.

 

  1. To properly interpret the Bible, it is helpful (if not necessary in some cases) to be familiar with the history, the culture, the geography, and the customs of the day.
  2. If you are reading a portion of Scripture, it is important to know what TIME period it covers. Is it the church age? Is it during the Law? Is it before the Law? Is it before or after the cross?
  3. Ask yourself the following questions: Who said it? To whom was it said? When was it said? What were the circumstances?
  4. If you are reading about Joshua in the Bible know WHICH Joshua!
  5. Chronology is important. History unfolds in time.
  6. Reading New Testament truth back into the Old Testament is not the proper way to understand the Old Testament.

 

  1. Look at “Manners and Customs of Bible Lands.”
  2. Matt. 9:17 – bottles were not glass, but made of skins of animals. Thinking in terms of a modern glass bottle would make this passage unintelligible.
  3. Consider the term “wine.” It is necessary to know the customs of the Jews. They always mixed their wine with between 3-10 parts water. Unmixed wine was called “strong drink” and was forbidden. They did not have hard liquor in those days. The distillation process was a Middle Age invention.
  4. Prov.19:13; 27:15– a contentious woman is likened to a leaky roof (the roofs were sod and continued to drip for days after the storm was over)
  5. The parable of the ten virgins is understood when the marriage customs are known.
  6. Ruth 4:8 – so he drew off his shoe
  7. Prov.20:14 – we cannot understand this proverb if we are thinking of the way we purchase products today. Solomon is speaking about haggling for prices as was the custom of his day in the open markets. (more like yard sales – not a modern mall)
  8. The goal is to discover what the author meant when he wrote it, not what folks in the 21st century think it means to them!
  9. It is the job of the interpreter to discover what the author actually said, NOT what we think he would have said if he lived in the 21st century.
  10. This is the same problem we are facing in our country today in interpreting the constitution.
  11. Joseph Story, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, and the leading constitutional scholar of the nineteenth century, in a book entitled Commentaries on the Constitution (1833), he called for interpreting the constitution according to the intent of its authors as revealed in the plain meaning of their language. He noted, “The first and fundamental rule in the interpretation of all instruments is to construe them according to the sense of the terms, and the intention of the parties.
  12. Thomas Jefferson similarly observed, “The Constitution on which our Union rests, shall be administered by me according to the safe and honest meaning contemplated by the plain understanding of the people of the United States, at the time of its adoption.
  13. They predicted that in future generations men would be tempted to interpret the constitution in a sense other than what it actually said… reading in to it…
  14. The goal in interpreting either the constitution or the Bible is to determine the author’s objective meaning, and resist the temptation to add the interpreter’s subjective views.
  15. In the context of United States constitutional interpretationoriginalism states that the Constitution has a fixed and knowable meaning which is established at the time of passage or ratification.
  16. One theory, original intent, is the view that interpretation of a written constitution is (or should be) consistent with what was meant by those who drafted and ratified it.
  17. These are issues those who deal with written documents consider all the time (lawyers).
  18. It is interesting to note that two of the most prominent and influential dispensational writers (Darby and Scofield) had legal backgrounds.
  19. Both were lawyers before entering the ministry.
  20. Their legal backgrounds allowed them to see more clearly than earlier interpreters the nature of a contract or covenant as expressed in Scripture.
  21. It gave them a healthy understanding of language and the hermeneutics of law… contracts… etc.
  22. A major ingredient of Dispensationalism is a proper understanding of the unconditional nature of the Abrahamic Covenant.
  23. Sir Robert Anderson wrote a brilliant commentary on Daniel 9 (The Coming Prince). He too was trained as a lawyer. He understood language for precisely what it said – and ended up unfolding one of the most spectacular prophecies in the Bible, by employing the literal method of interpretation! He served as chief of the criminal investigative department of the Scotland Yard.  
  24. Three helpful hints in interpreting speech:
  • Seek the ordinary meaning of the language
  • Identify the literary style
  • Seek the author’s intended meaning

 

Cooper’s Golden Rule of Interpretation: “When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense; therefore, take every word at its primary, ordinary, usual, literal meaning unless the facts of the immediate context, studied in light of related passages and axiomatic and fundamental truths, indicate clearly otherwise.”

[1] Tan, Paul Lee, Literal Interpretation of the Bible, p. 15

[2] Pentecost, Things to Come, p. 9

[3] Pentecost, Things to Come, p.10

[4] Ibid.

1.   “Figurative language refers to any words that are used with a meaning other than their common literary sense.” [1]

a.   Phil.3:2 – a human being is spoken of as a “dog.”

b.   John 21:25 – is not intended to be a scientific estimate of all the available space in the world.

c.    Great errors occur when figurative language is taken literally, and when literal language is taken figuratively.

 2.   The literal method acknowledges figurative language.

a.   One of the primary criticisms of the literal method is based on a misunderstanding of what is meant by literal.

 i.     The critics charge of us a “blocky literalness”, in other words, interpreting every word and expression as literal.

 ii.     That is not what we mean. By literal we mean that each word has “the same exact basic meaning it would have in normal, ordinary, customary usage, whether employed in writing, speaking or thinking.”

iii.     Some have suggested that we call it the “normal” method of interpretation.

b.   In normal conversation and writing figures of speech are often employed. The same is true in the Bible. We acknowledge those figures of speech. (see Bullingers)

c.    Often folks assume that the literal method is the opposite of figurative interpretation. That is not correct. IT is not an either/or situation. The literal method incorporates figures of speech… but those figures convey a literal meaning.

3.   Examples of figures of speech [2]

a.   Simile: A declaration that one thing resembles another, or a comparison by resemblance. (often using like or as)

 i.     Luke 22:44 – “His sweat was as it were great drops of blood.”

 ii.     I Pet. 2:25 – “Ye were as sheep going astray.”

 iii.     I Pet. 5:8 – “The devil as a roaring lion, walketh about.”

iv.     Rev. 6:12: The sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and the moon became as blood.”

v.     Psalm 1:3 – He shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water.”   (Cf. vs. 4)

 vi.     What is the literal meaning in each of these?

b.   Metaphor: One is or represents another; comparison by representation.

i. Psalm 23:1 – “The Lord is my Shepherd”

ii. Psalm 18:2 – “The Lord is my Rock”

iii. Matthew 24:26 – “This is my body”

iv. John 8:12 – “I am the light of the world”

v. What is the literal meaning conveyed by these figures of speech?

c.    Symbol: “A symbol is a representative and graphic delineation of an actual event, truth, or object. The thing that is depicted is not the real thing, but conveys a representative meaning.” (Paul Lee Tan)

i. Rev. 12:9 – Satan is referred to as a dragon and a serpent

ii. Daniel 7:2-7 – Four beasts coming up out of the sea.

iii. The Bible is RICH in symbolic meaning.

iv. The literal method of Bible interpretation acknowledges symbols.

v. The symbols, however, were designed to teach a LITERAL truth.

vi. Example: Ps. 18:2 – The Lord is not literally a rock or a fortress. However, this symbolic language is designed to convey a LITERAL truth. (What literal truth is being conveyed?)

vii. John 1:29 – Behold the Lamb of God. (What literal truth is taught by this symbol?)

d.   Personification: Personification is a figure of speech in which inanimate entities are ascribed qualities of living things we have personification.

i. Psalm 19: “The heavens declare . . . The skies proclaim. Their voice goes out.”

ii. Proverbs: wisdom is personified as a lady

e.   Hyperbole: “When more is said than is literally meant”

i. Gen. 2:24 – “Therefore shall a man leave his father and mother and cleave unto his wife.” This does not mean that is to forsake and no longer to love or care for his parents. (Bullinger)

ii. Deut. 1:28 – “The cities are great and walled up to heaven.”

iii. Matt. 5:29 – “If thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out…”

iv. But a literal truth is taught by these expressions. What is taught in these passages?

f.     Synecdoche: The exchange of one idea for another associated idea.

 i.     The WHOLE is put for a part or portion thereof:

  • Matt. 3:5 – “Then went out to him Jerusalem, and all Judea, and all the region round about Jordan.”  (This does not mean every last human being in that part of the world, but those who came represented the whole.)

 ii.     A PART is put for the whole:

  • Rom. 12:1 – “Present your bodies a living sacrifice.” (Obviously offering one’s body is an expression that means offering one’s entire SELF – body, soul, and spirit – our all on the altar.)

g.   Euphemism:  an elegant or refined expression for a distasteful or coarse one, or a gentle and beautiful expression instead of the strictly literal one, which might offend the ear or the persons addressed. [3]

i. Judges 3:24 —“Surely he covereth his feet in his summer chamber.”

ii. A word or expression used to “soften” an uncomfortable subject.

iii. Sleep = death

iv. Bathroom = we don’t really take a bath when we say we are going there. (water closet in Canada)

v. “Touch a woman” = sexual relationship (I Cor. 7:1)

h.   Be careful when you tell folks that you use the literal method of interpretation. This does NOT mean that we interpret every word and expression literally without acknowledging figures of speech. That WOULD be extremely foolish!

i.      A problem often arises in knowing when figurative language is being used.

i. The problem of taking literally that which is obviously figurative: (Matthew 24:26 – “This is my body”)

ii. The problem of taking figuratively that which is literal. (The Second Coming; Resurrection; demons; miracles)

iii. The problem of personal opinion. We might think it perfectly appropriate to use the figure of a shepherd or a door to speak of Christ, but not a thief. It is not up to us to determine what an appropriate figure might be.

Cooper’s Golden Rule of Interpretation: “When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense; therefore, take every word at its primary, ordinary, usual, literal meaning unless the facts of the immediate context, studied in light of related passages and axiomatic and fundamental truths, indicate clearly otherwise.”

 

4.   The purpose of using figurative language [4]

a.   To emphasize a point

 i.     Luke13:33 – “Tell that old fox.”   This is much more forceful than to say, “Tell the king.”

b.   To exhort to action

i.     “Behold I stand at the door and knock” as opposed to I am ready for a response.

c.    To aid the memory

 i.     “Don’t hide your light under a bushel.”

 ii.     Be a “good Samaritan”

 iii.     He is the “salt of the earth.”

iv.     He has “feet of clay”

d. To effectively illustrate truth

i. Jesus is the “Bread of life” and the “Light of the world”

ii. The kingdom of heaven is like “leaven” (which speaks of slow, steady, corruption)

e. To clarify

i. Simple truths are used to teach more complicated truth.

ii. The familiar can be used to teach the unfamiliar

iii. God is spoken of as our Father or Husband

f. As a “code”

i. Matt. 13:10-17 – these parables were given to reveal truth to those who trusted Him but to conceal truth from those who did not.

ii. Also prophecy is revelation, but given in figurative language that may not be understood until the time of fulfillment. (John 2:19-22 – destroying and raising up the Temple of His body)

5. The literal method acknowledges the use of allegory.

a. Allegory: A continued representation or implication (a lengthy metaphor, often in story form)

b. The literal method of interpretation acknowledges the existence of allegory in the Bible. But great caution should be employed here.

c. Gal. 4:22-24 – Here the Bible SAYS it is an allegory.

i. But be careful. This does not mean that this story is not historical. It IS genuine history.

ii. But it has an allegorical meaning – because God assigned it such!

d. John 15:1-10 – The Vine and the branches – a picture of the relationship between Christ and the believer during His period of absence.

e. A parable is also a form of an allegory. There are many parables in the Scriptures. They too convey a literal truth.

6. Acknowledging the existence of allegories differs greatly from using the allegorical method (or spiritualizing method) of interpretation.

a. In the third century, the church fathers abandoned the literal method of interpreting the Bible (which was adhered to relatively consistently during the first two centuries of the church) in favor of Origen’s allegorical-spiritualized hermeneutic.

b. Clement (an early leader of the Alexandrian school in AD 190) saw the literal meaning of Scripture as being a “starting point” for interpretation.

i. He considered the literal interpretation to be “suitable for the mass of Christians,” but that God revealed himself to the spiritual elites through a deeper meaning of Scripture.

ii. Do you see the danger in this thinking? (Only the spiritually elite can understand the DEEPER meaning of the Bible.)

c. “Allegorism is the method of interpreting a literary text that regards the literal sense as the vehicle for a secondary, more spiritual and more profound sense.” [5]

i. In an allegory, words are not understood in their literal, customary, or normal sense.

ii. They are given a “spiritual” meaning which means that the interpreter looks beyond the literal meaning of the text for a spiritual, hidden, deeper and more profound meaning. (This is not unlike a fable that presents a moral truth.)

iii. Examples:

1. David cast five stones at Goliath: the stones of diligence, humility, faith, honesty, and ________ (whatever you want it to be!) You can conquer giants in your life too… would be the spiritual meaning.** 2. Thus, the story of Adam and Eve teaches us truth about the spiritual battle, but it is not necessary to believe that Adam and Eve were historical figures who actually existed.** 3. **Apply this method to the resurrection of Jesus Christ and this results in outright heresy.**

iv. Origen, an early church father believed:

 
1. That “Noah’s ark pictured the church and Noah represented Christ.** 2. **Rebekah’s drawing water at the well for Abraham’s servant means we must daily come to the Scriptures to meet Christ.** 3. **In Jesus triumphal entry the donkey represented the Old Testament, its colt depicted the New Testament and the two apostles pictured the moral and mystical senses of the Scriptures.”**

v. In the allegorical or figurative method, the literal meaning is considered shallow and the hidden meaning is considered “deep.”

vi. The literal meaning is either denied, ignored, or considered entirely secondary to the allegorical meaning.

d. In the allegorical method, the authority for the interpretation lies within the imagination of the interpreter rather than the Scripture itself. In the final analysis, in the allegorical method one is left without any means by which the conclusions of the interpreter may be tested. (Dwight Pentecost)

e. The issue becomes not what God has spoken but what the interpreter thinks. In other words, the text becomes a servant to the interpreter rather than the interpreter being subservient to the text.[6]

f. Martin Luther was quite outspoken against the allegorizing of Scripture:

i. “Allegories are empty speculations and as it were the scum of Holy Scripture.”

ii. “Origen’s allegories are not worth so much dirt.”

iii. “To allegorize is to juggle the Scripture.”

iv. “Allegorizing may degenerate into a mere monkey game.”

7. Three dangers of the allegorical method of interpretation: [7]

i. It does not interpret Scripture.

ii. The mind of the interpreter is the final authority.

iii. It provides no objective means by which the interpretation can be tested.

iv. “To state that the principal meaning of the Bible is a second-sense meaning, and that the principal method of interpretation is spiritualizing, is to open the door to almost uncontrolled speculation and imagination.” [8]

8. The literal method of interpretation allows for allegories but does not employ an allegorical method of interpretation.

a. Charles Ryrie wrote that a literal interpretation “does not preclude or exclude correct understanding of types, illustrations, apocalypses, and other genres within the basic framework of literal interpretation.”

b. Charles Ryrie also wrote that literal interpretation “…might also be called plain interpretation so that no one receives the mistaken notion that the literal principle rules out figures of speech.” [9]

c. “It is a necessary basic assumption of biblical interpretation that attention to the plain meaning of the text is the door to healthy understanding of the Bible.” (Paul Karleen)

9. The interpretation of parables [10]

a. Begin with the immediate context

b. Identify the central point

c. Identify irrelevant details

d. Identify relevant details

e. Compare parallel and contrasting passages

f. Base doctrine on clear, literal passages

 

Some important distinctions:

  1. Literal interpretation does not exclude figurative language

[1] McQuilkin, Understanding and Applying the Bible, p. 137

[2] Bullinger, Figures of Speech in the Bible

[3]Bullinger, Ethelbert William: Figures of Speech Used in the Bible. London; New York : Eyre & Spottiswoode; E. & J. B. Young & Co., 1898, S. 419

[4] Points a-f taken from J. Robertson McQuilkin’s Understanding and Applying the Bible

[5] Ramm, Bernard, Protestant Biblical Interpretation

[6] Woods , Andrew, Dispensational Hermeneutics

[7] Pentecost, Dwight, Things to Come

[8] Ramm, Bernard, Protestant Biblical Interpretation

[9] Ryrie, Charles, Dispensationalism Today

[10] McQuilkin, Understanding and Applying the Bible, p.153-164

[11] Donald Bloesh, Holy Scripture, from a seven volume set, Christian Foundations IV Pres

A. Context

  1. Consider the Context

a. Three catchy slogans:

a. Be a slave to the context.

b. The three rules of interpretation: context, context, context

c. A text without its context is but a pretext.

b. Consider the greater historical and cultural context

i. Put the passage in the historical context: what century?

ii. Put the passage in the proper cultural context: what country?

c. The context of the paragraph

  1. What is the theme of the paragraph?

  2. How does this verse fit into that theme?

  3. Gal. 5:4 – “falling from grace.” Does it mean the loss of salvation? What is the context?

  4. Matt. “He that endureth to the end shall be saved.” What is the context?

  5. Jas. 4:9 – “Let your laughter be turned to mourning…”

  6. Matt. 7:1 – judge not that ye be not judged…

b. The context of the book

  1. What is/are the purpose(s) of the book?

a. John 20:31 – that ye might believe

b. I John 5:13 – that ye might believe

c. Ecc.1:3 – The book must be interpreted in light of the oft-repeated phrase: “under the sun.” Otherwise, the book is extremely pessimistic and depressing! (1:2,5-11)

  1. The book of Romans is a treatise on the theme of righteousness. It is not likely that you could accurately interpret an isolated verse from that book without being familiar with the context of the book as a whole.

  2. I John 3:9 – taken by itself it might seem to teach that believers do not sin. But consider the context of the rest of the book. (Cf. 1:8-10)

  3. To determine the context or the theme of a book may require reading and re-reading the book – preferably in one sitting.

  4. Read and observe what you read. Observing the context is especially important if you are doing a word study. The tendency is to ignore context… but it is deadly.

  5. Martin Luther said, “I study my Bible as I gather apples. First, I shake the whole tree that the ripest may fall. Then I shake each limb, and when I have shaken each limb I shake each branch and every twig. Then I look under every leaf.”

c. The context of the Bible as a whole

i. The analogy of Scripture… Compare the passage to the rest of Scripture. Scripture never contradicts itself.

ii. However, false doctrines, like false witnesses, agree not among themselves.

iii. Does this interpretation contradict other portions of Scripture?

  1. The folly of taking passages out of context:

a. Matt.24:13 – the context is the Tribulation; salvation speaks of being delivered from destruction.

b. James 2:24 – all by itself it contradicts Paul and teaches salvation by works.

c. II Cor. 8:9 – to support the gospel of wealth (also “forgive us our debts”)

d. I Pet.3:3 – some have used this passage to teach that women should not braid their hair or wear gold. But be careful here – if that is the case, then Peter is also forbidding them to wear clothes!

e. I John 2:27 – Some have taken this verse by itself and have concluded that they could understand the whole Bible on their own without assistance from anyone, ignoring the revelation elsewhere that gifted individuals are given to the Body of Christ to teach others.

f. Ezekiel 37:15-17 – The Mormons state that this passage teaches that the two sticks represent the Book of Mormon and the Bible. BUT – read the context! It is explained in the context to mean the regathering of the House of Israel. (vs.22)

B. Analogy of Scripture

  1. Analogy of Scripture states that no portion of Scripture contradicts another portion of Scripture when rightly divided and that one portion of Scripture will often explain another portion.

a. Since the Holy Spirit is the divine Author of the Bible, all sixty-six books will be complementary and self-consistent.

b. There are what we call “apparent” contradictions in the Bible from the human perspective. There are passages that SEEM to contradict one another.

c. However, the fault lies in us, not in Scripture. The failure is on our part to SEE or understand the harmony that does exist.

d. It is certain that Scripture nowhere contradicts Scripture; rather, one passage explains another. This sound principle of interpreting Scripture by Scripture is sometimes called the analogy of Scripture or the analogy of faith.

  1. Where do you find the Scriptures to compare to the passage you are studying?

a. Cross references in the margin of your Bible

b. The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (available for free online)

  1. Obscure passages should always be interpreted in light of clear ones.

a. For example, Jesus said, “The Father is greater than I.” This statement could be taken in a couple of different ways. But the correct interpretation is the one that harmonizes with the rest of Scripture, rightly divided.

C. Exegesis

    1. Exegesis: The analysis of a text.
  • · “Meaning” (of the Scriptural passage) is not our subjective thoughts read into the text but God’s objective truth read out of the text. (Dr. Howard Hendricks)

2. Don’t force a passage to fit your lesson

    • I Tim. 1:5 – Don’t use this passage if you are teaching on the value of the 10 commandments. The word commandment here refers to the command (charge) in vs.3. (same term)
    • There are lots of Bible verses that we might be tempted to use in a study… because the WORDING seems to fit so well into what we are trying to say.
    • This is called by some “hijacking” a text. This can be done naively or intentionally.

3. Don’t force a passage to fit your theology

    1. I John 2:2 – Christ died for the sin of the whole world (Calvinism’s twist)

    2. II Pet.2:20 – someone who believes you can lose your salvation might use this verse to prove his point. But if you follow the word “they” backward – it refers to the wells without water – the unsaved false teachers… not believers.

    3. Isa. 53:5c – “By His stripes we are healed.” The charismatics love to use this verse because the wording seems to support their theology. But healed from what? The context is SIN – not pneumonia or physical blindness

4. Don’t force a passage to fit your practice

    1. “Cardinal Newman defends the Roman Catholic concept of the “nun” from the case of Anna in the Temple” (Luke 2:36-38).
    2. Charismatics use passages such as (Ex.23:25) to support the notion that God will protect us from sickness if we obey.
    3. The Roman church has for years tried to keep the Bible away from its people. They used II Pet. 1:21 as their proof text: the Bible was not intended for “private interpretation.” They conclude, “leave the interpretation to us.”
    4. Some charismatic groups engage in a practice of financial scams. They tell people that if they give to their ministry, that God will give them even more money in return. (Prov.3:9-10; Mal. 3:10)

5. Don’t force a passage to fit your convictions.

    1. Jer. 10:2-4 – most tracts I have read on the Christmas issue use this passage to promote their convictions against the use of a Christmas tree. But this verse is not talking about any such thing!

    2. Deut. 6:7 – I have often seen this passage used to promote the home school movement… because it mentions teaching in the home. (But Moses is not talking about algebra and biology).

    3. I Pet.3:3 – I visited a Pilgrim Church one time where the women could not cut their hair or braid it. They were not allowed to wear any gold jewelry either. (I noticed that they did allow them to wear apparel – clothing!

  • Don’t look for a passage that SEEMS to support what you are trying to say… or what you want it to say.
  • ·Don’t impose your preconceived ideas on any Bible verse. Let the verse say what it says.
  • ·Exegesis is extracting from a verse what is actually found IN the verse.

D. Some Important Distinctions

  1. Keep Israel and the Church distinct

a. God has a plan for the nation Israel.

i. Israel is God’s earthly people.

ii. It includes the Law and His unconditional covenants which WILL be fulfilled literally one day.

iii. While Israel is under God’s chastisement today, God is not finished with that nation.

b. God has a plan for the church.

i. The church is God’s heavenly people.

ii. God’s plan for the church is revealed nowhere in the OT but is revealed in the NT epistles.

iii. When this age comes to an end, God will once again deal with the nation Israel.

2. Keep Law and Grace Distinct

a. The Law was given to Israel and Israel alone.

b. The gentile nations and the church are NOT under the Law.

c. The church is “under grace” as a rule of life (Romans 6:14). The Law does not save, nor does the Law sanctify.

d. This truth does not set well with many believers.

  1. Keep Position and Condition Distinct
  2. Keep Salvation and Rewards Distinct
  3. Keep Salvation and Discipleship Distinct
  4. Keep the two comings of Christ Distinct

a. Second Coming

i. In power and great glory – every eye shall see Him

ii. At the end of the Tribulation

iii. He descends to the earth

iv. He comes to deliver Israel

b. The Rapture

i. Invisible to the world

ii. Just before the Tribulation

iii. He descends to the clouds

iv. He comes to deliver the church

5. Keep The Gospel of Grace and the Gospel of the Kingdom Distinct

a. Matt.10:5-7 – the Lord sent His disciples to Israel exclusively to preach the gospel of the Kingdom.

b. Matt.28:19-20 – Sent to all nations

c. Acts 20:24 – The gospel of the grace of God

6. Keep the Various Judgments Distinct

a. Bema seat

b. Great White Throne

c. Israel and the Nations

7. Keep the Various Peoples of the World Distinct (I Cor. 10:32)

a. The Jew

b. The Gentiles

c. The Church

E. Consider Dispensational distinctions

  1. Dispensation defined: A dispensation is a distinguishable economy in the outworking of God’s purpose.
  2. There are seven distinguishable dispensations in the Scriptures.
  3. Three in particular will greatly affect Bible interpretation: Law, Grace, and Kingdom. These three are mentioned in Ephesians 3.
  4. A handy way to remember these three ages is as follows:

i. Mt. Sinai – the Law begins

ii. Mt. Calvary = the age of grace begins

iii. Mt. of Olives – The Second Coming – the Kingdom begins

5. Most of the content of the Bible pertains to these three dispensations.

F. Realize that there are “gaps” in Scripture

  1. Isa.61:1-2 cf. Luke 4:19
  2. Isa. 9:6 – a gap between the “Son given” and the “kingdom being upon His shoulders.” The Jews had no way to know there was a gap, but looking back, we can see it.
  3. Daniel 9:24-27 – a gap between the 69th and 70th week is the time in which the church exists.

G. Progress of revelation

  1. “Progressive revelation is the recognition that God’s message to man was not given in one single act, but was unfolded in a long series of successive acts and through the minds and hands of many men of varying backgrounds.”
  2. Acts 17:30 – In ages past God winked at the ignorance of Gentiles, but now God commands them to repent. They are MORE accountable today because of the progress of revelation.
  3. John 1:17 – The Law came by Moses, but grace by Jesus Christ.
  4. Heb.1:1-2 – God who at sundry times… spake…

i. God did not reveal Himself or His plan all at once.

ii. God has maintained a continuity of revelation to mankind through the centuries.

iii. The former revelations were incomplete. Original revelations were fully true and fully reliable, but incomplete.

Introduction:

1. Yogi Berra once said, “You can see a lot just by looking.”

2. This might go without saying, but it probably deserves to be said: As you read, carefully observe what you are reading.

3. It is possible to read without thinking… without observing.

4. To interpret the Bible properly there is probably nothing more essential that a careful observation of the text as we read.

5. As you read, ask God to “open your eyes” to the truths in His Word. They are there to BE observed. (Psalm 119:18)

6. This will require a slow reading…

7. As you read carefully pay attention to the details.

8. For me it requires reading and re-reading the same sentence many times sometimes.

9. Stop and THINK about who is trying to communicate to you through this Book!

10. It means that we are to read the Word with a HUNGER to know Christ in a deeper way through His Word. It is a revelation of Him.

11. As we read we behold the glory of the Lord in the mirror of His Word (II Cor. 3:18). The glory of God is worthy of our attention.

Things to Be Looking For:

 

1. The meaning of words:

a. Do you know the meaning of the English word in your translation?

b. Do you also know the meaning of the Greek word underlying that English word?

c. Don’t be lazy… look it up. Do not assume you know.

 

2. Terms of conclusion (to a thought or an argument):

a. Therefore

b. So

c. So then…

d. Because

e. For this cause…

f. Finally…

3. Terms of contrast:

a. But

b. However

c. Nevertheless

d. Yet

e. Though

4. Terms of time:

a. As soon as

b. At that time

c. Later

d. Now

e. Soon

f. Until

g. When

h. Morning, day

i. Evening, night

j. A feast day

5. Terms of chronology

a. After

b. Afterwards

c. First

d. Second

e. Lastly

f. After this

g. Then

h. Finally

6. Terms of description:

a. Adjectives

b. Adverbs

7. Terms that connect: (other words, phrases, thoughts, concepts, etc.)

a. And

b. But

c. With

8. Terms that are instrumental: (or means)

a. With

b. By

c. By means of

9. Terms (or concepts) that appear repeatedly:

a. Note the number seven in the book of Revelation (54 times!)

b. Note the words justice; just; (22 times) righteous; righteousness (44 times) in the book of Romans

c. Note the word “believe” in the gospel of John (83 times)

d. Note the word “law” in Galatians (32 times)

e. Note the word “holy” in Leviticus (92 times)

f. Can you think of other repeated words or phrases in a particular book of the Bible?

10. Terms that speak of reason or purpose:

a. That; so that; in order that

i. This is often the translation of a VERY common Greek word that introduces purposes clauses: hina

ii. Gal.3:14 – there are two purpose clauses in this verse (both are hina)

b. For

c. For this cause

11. Terms of condition:

 

a. If

 

b. Since

 

12. Promises

 

13. Contrasts

 

14. Comparisons

 

15. Commands

 

16. Warnings

 

a. Lo!

 

b. Beware!

 

c. Behold!

 

d. Woe!

 

17. Natural outlines in the text

 

a. A common outline in the Pauline epistles (first doctrine, then practice; or first position, then condition)

 

b. Look for a main theme and subdivisions of that theme

 

c. Don’t force the text to fit your outline. (That’s backwards!)

Charts and Outlines Help Us to Observe

1. Dispensational charts

2. Eschatology charts

3. Chronology charts

4. Diagrams of passages

5. Parallel passages

6. Doctrinal charts

a. Salvation and rewards

b. Salvation and discipleship

c. Position and condition

d. Israel and the church

e. First and Second Coming of Christ

f. Christ’s deity and humanity

7. Make your own charts

 

INVESTIGATING WORDS

Doing a Word Study

1. Determine which word you want to study.

2. If it is a New Testament word, determine the Greek word from which it was translated. (Use a Strong’s Concordance)

3. Determine the meaning(s) of that Greek word. (Consult a Vine’s Expository Dictionary of the NT; or Zodhiates Complete Word Study Dictionary)

4. Look up all the occurrences of that Greek word in the New Testament. (Use an Englishman’s Concordance)

5. Study each occurrence in its context. (You may also want to consult commentaries at this point)

6. Observe:

a. Determine which meaning the word has in that particular context. (If there are multiple meanings for one word)

b. Consider every word in the verse; consider each phrase; note the subjects; verbs; modifiers; etc.

c. What is the main point of the passage?

d. What did the author mean when he wrote it?

e. What is the purpose of the passage?

f. Ask yourself the key questions: Who? What? When? Where? Under what circumstances? How? Why?

g. Determine what important truth about the concept is revealed in each context.

7. Determine which meaning the word has in that particular context. (Some words have multiple meanings – but this is not always the case.)

8. Determine what important truths about the word/concept are revealed in each context.

9. Compare cross references to discover other related truths. (Consult a Treasury of Scripture Knowledge; Vines Topical Bible)

10. Record your findings on a list or chart.

11. Look up other Greek words which may be translated by the same English word and look up other synonyms for the term.

a. Repeat steps #1-8,10 for each synonym, recording findings from each different Greek word separately.

12. Organize your findings into outline form.

13. Make personal application.

a. Are there any commands in the passage? Any promises?

b. Are there any evil to avoid?

c. Is there a good work I should begin to do?

d. Is there truth in this passage in which I should trust?

e. What can I learn about myself?

f. What can I learn about God?

Pastor Jim Delany

(603) 898-4258

address-icon

11 ermer road 

salem, nh 03079

COPYRIGHT © 2023 SALEM BIBLE CHURCH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.